THE SHORT VERSION
- Famitsu's issue for the week of October 31, 2026 carries four reviewed games, and GoNintendo and NintendoEverything publish the same four scores for each.Famitsu 2026 年 10 月 31 日当周评分涵盖四款游戏，GoNintendo 与 NintendoEverything 给出的四组分数完全一致。
- Star Wars: Galactic Racer leads at 34/40 from 8, 9, 9 and 8, followed by Deck of Haunts at 32, MeowPower Yachiyo at 28 and Glow Box at 27.《星球大战：银河赛车》以 8、9、9、8 合计 34/40 居首，其后是 32 分的《鬼屋牌局》、28 分的《喵力量！八千代》与 27 分的《微光盒子》。
- Neither outlet lists a game the other omits; they differ in presentation, with GoNintendo printing totals out of 40 and NintendoEverything printing the four scores only.两家媒体都没有漏掉对方列出的游戏；差别在呈现方式：GoNintendo 每行附上 40 分制总分，NintendoEverything 只列四个分数。
Four games, four scores each四款游戏，各四个分数
Famitsu's review round for the week of October 31, 2026 covers four games, and both GoNintendo and NintendoEverything published the same set on the same day. Star Wars: Galactic Racer received 8, 9, 9 and 8 from the magazine's four critics. Deck of Haunts received 9, 6, 9 and 8. MeowPower Yachiyo received 6, 8, 7 and 7. Glow Box received 5, 8, 8 and 6. GoNintendo prints a total beside each line: 34 out of 40, 32, 28 and 27. Both posts present the batch as the week's round rather than a single review, and both date it to October 31.Famitsu 2026 年 10 月 31 日当周的评分涵盖四款游戏，GoNintendo 与 NintendoEverything 在同一天发布了同一份名单。《星球大战：银河赛车》从杂志的四位评审手中拿到 8、9、9、8。《鬼屋牌局》拿到 9、6、9、8。《喵力量！八千代》拿到 6、8、7、7。《微光盒子》拿到 5、8、8、6。GoNintendo 在每一行后面印出总分：40 分制的 34、32、28 与 27。两篇稿件都把这批分数当作当周的整轮评分，而不是单篇评测，日期也都标注为 10 月 31 日。
The running order differs between the two posts. GoNintendo lists the games alphabetically, running from Deck of Haunts through Glow Box and MeowPower! Yachiyo to STAR WARS: Galactic Racer. NintendoEverything orders them by total, starting with Star Wars: Galactic Racer at 34 and finishing with Glow Box at 27. The four numbers behind every total are the same in both lists. Read top to bottom, NintendoEverything's order is the ranking and GoNintendo's is not.两篇稿件的排列顺序不同。GoNintendo 按字母顺序排列，从《鬼屋牌局》经《微光盒子》《喵力量！八千代》到《星球大战：银河赛车》。NintendoEverything 按总分排序，以 34 分的《星球大战：银河赛车》开头，以 27 分的《微光盒子》收尾。每个总分背后的四个数字，在两份名单里完全相同。从上往下读，NintendoEverything 的顺序就是排名，GoNintendo 的不是。
How the four-critic total is built四位评审的总分是怎么算的
Both outlets explain the method. GoNintendo writes that each Famitsu review is handled by four critics, that each critic gives a game a score from 1 to 10, and that the scores are added together, so a perfect game would receive 40 out of 40. NintendoEverything gives the same account in a single sentence, noting that four editors gave out scores and that the final total is out of a total of 40 points. That matters when a total is quoted without the four numbers, because a 32 can hide four 8s as easily as it can hide a 9 and a 6.两家媒体都解释了计分方式。GoNintendo 写道，每篇 Famitsu 评测由四位评审负责，每位给游戏打 1 到 10 分，四个分数相加，也就是说满分作品会拿到 40 分。NintendoEverything 用一句话给出同样的说明，指出四位编辑分别打分，最终总分是 40 分制。这一点在只引用总分而不列四个分数时很要紧，因为 32 分既可能是四个 8 分，也可能是一个 9 分加一个 6 分。
GoNintendo also says where the numbers come from. Its post states that the latest issue of Famitsu has made its way to subscribers in Japan before the list of four games follows. NintendoEverything files its version under News, Switch and Switch 2, and points readers to its archive of earlier Famitsu score rounds. Neither post names the issue number, and neither gives the issue date beyond the week label.GoNintendo 还说明了数字的来源。它的稿件写到，最新一期 Famitsu 已经送到日本的订阅者手中，随后才列出四款游戏的分数。NintendoEverything 把稿件归在 News、Switch 与 Switch 2 三个分类下，并把读者引向它此前的 Famitsu 评分存档。两篇稿件都没有给出发行期号，除了「当周」这个标签，也没有给出发行日期。
Galactic Racer leads with two 9s《银河赛车》凭两个 9 分领跑
Star Wars: Galactic Racer is the highest scorer of the week, with two critics giving it 9 and two giving it 8 for 34 out of 40. That is two points clear of Deck of Haunts and seven clear of Glow Box. It is also the most consistent set of scores in the round, because no critic placed it more than a point away from any other. No critic placed the game below 8, which is the highest floor of any title in the round.《星球大战：银河赛车》是当周最高分，两位评审给 9 分、两位给 8 分，合计 40 分制的 34 分。这比《鬼屋牌局》高两分，比《微光盒子》高七分。它也是这一轮里分数最集中的一款，没有任何一位评审与其他人的差距超过一分。没有评审给它低于 8 分，这是这一轮里最高的分数下限。
GoNintendo's post carries the subtitle "Scarily good scores", and that line is the only editorial comment either outlet attaches to the numbers. NintendoEverything's post has no equivalent line and no adjectives. The two outlets agree that the game took the top place in the round, and neither reports what the critics said about it beyond the four scores. NintendoEverything's post opens with the week label and goes straight to the four lines.GoNintendo 的稿件带有「Scarily good scores」这个副标题，这也是两家媒体在数字之外唯一的编辑性表述。NintendoEverything 的稿件没有对应的句子，也没有形容词。两家都同意这款游戏在这一轮里排第一，而除了四个分数，两家都没有报道评审具体说了什么。NintendoEverything 的稿件以周次标签开头，随后直接进入四行分数。
A 6 pulls Deck of Haunts below the top一个 6 分把《鬼屋牌局》压到第二
Deck of Haunts lands second on 32 from 9, 6, 9 and 8. Three of those scores sit near the top of the scale, and the single 6 is what keeps the total two points under Galactic Racer. That 6 sits beside a pair of 9s, which gives Deck of Haunts the widest split in the round, three points from the highest critic to the lowest. Glow Box shares that three-point spread, and the other two games stay within two.《鬼屋牌局》以 9、6、9、8 合计 32 分排在第二。其中三个分数接近量表顶端，而那个单独的 6 分正是让它比《银河赛车》低两分的原因。这个 6 分与两个 9 分并列，使《鬼屋牌局》成为这一轮分差最大的作品，最高分与最低分相差三分。《微光盒子》同样是三分差距，另外两款则都在两分以内。
MeowPower! Yachiyo reaches 28 from 6, 8, 7 and 7, the tightest spread of the four at two points. Glow Box is last on 27 from 5, 8, 8 and 6. It is the only game in the round to receive a 5, and a second critic gave it a 6, which means half the panel put it at 6 or below while the other half put it at 8. Added up, 27 is the lowest total of the week and seven points behind the leader.《喵力量！八千代》以 6、8、7、7 得到 28 分，是四款中分差最小的，仅两分。《微光盒子》以 5、8、8、6 排在最后，27 分。它是这一轮里唯一拿到 5 分的游戏，还有第二位评审给了 6 分，这意味着评审团一半人给它 6 分或更低，另一半人给了 8 分。把四个分数加起来，27 分是当周最低总分，比榜首低七分。
Where the two lists agree and where they differ两份名单一致与不同之处
The two lists agree on every number. Each of the four games appears in both posts with the same four scores, and neither outlet lists a title that the other leaves out. GoNintendo's line for Deck of Haunts reads 9 / 6 / 9 / 8 with a total of 32, and NintendoEverything's line for the same game reads 9/6/9/8. The same holds for the other three games. The only formatting difference inside the numbers is spacing: GoNintendo separates each score with slashes and spaces, while NintendoEverything uses slashes without spaces.两份名单在每一个数字上都一致。四款游戏都出现在两篇稿件里，四个分数相同，两家媒体也都没有列出对方漏掉的标题。GoNintendo 为《鬼屋牌局》写的一行是 9 / 6 / 9 / 8，总分 32；NintendoEverything 对同一款游戏的一行是 9/6/9/8。另外三款也是如此。数字内部唯一的格式差别是空格：GoNintendo 用斜杠加空格分隔每个分数，NintendoEverything 只用斜杠不加空格。
What differs is presentation and naming. GoNintendo adds the total out of 40 to every line and credits Universo Nintendo at the foot of the list. NintendoEverything prints the four scores without totals, though its note explains that the total out of 40 exists. GoNintendo writes MeowPower! Yachiyo with an exclamation mark and STAR WARS: Galactic Racer in capitals, while NintendoEverything uses MeowPower Yachiyo and Star Wars: Galactic Racer. Both spellings point to the same four scores, so a reader searching either name lands on the same round.不同的是呈现方式与写法。GoNintendo 在每一行后面加上 40 分制总分，并在名单末尾注明来源 Universo Nintendo。NintendoEverything 只印四个分数，没有总分，尽管它的注释说明总分是 40 分制。GoNintendo 写作带感叹号的 MeowPower! Yachiyo 与全大写的 STAR WARS: Galactic Racer，NintendoEverything 则写作 MeowPower Yachiyo 与 Star Wars: Galactic Racer。两种写法指向同一组四个分数，读者搜哪个名字都会落到同一轮评分上。
What a score round does not tell you一份评分表不能告诉你的事
Neither post attaches a platform, a release date, a price or a genre to any of the four games. Neither reproduces any review text, so the numbers arrive without the reasoning behind them. NintendoEverything's Switch and Switch 2 tags are categories on its own site, not a statement that all four games are on those systems. A score of 27 out of 40 says nothing about length, price or audience, and neither post fills that in.两篇稿件都没有为这四款游戏标注平台、发售日、价格或类型。两家也都没有转载任何评测正文，因此这些数字到来时没有附带理由。NintendoEverything 的 Switch 与 Switch 2 标签是它自己网站的分类，并不等于说四款游戏都在这些主机上。40 分制里的 27 分说明不了流程长度、价格或受众，两篇稿件也没有补上这些。
The round also carries no comparison with earlier weeks, beyond NintendoEverything's link to its archive. For readers following what else is landing on Nintendo hardware, this site's file on the Croc 2 Switch remaster covers a re-release with 40 levels, Yacht Club's Mina the Hollower physical release update tracks a boxed edition still in progress, and Wild Blue Skies' Switch launch covers a rail shooter that arrived at $14.99. All three concern Nintendo hardware releases rather than review scores.这一轮也没有与更早周次的比较，只有 NintendoEverything 指向存档的链接。对于关心任天堂硬件上还有哪些作品的读者，本站关于《鳄鱼 2》Switch 重制版的稿件覆盖了一款含 40 个关卡的再版，Yacht Club 的《米娜与霍洛》实体版进展追踪的是一份仍在推进的盒装版，而《狂野蓝天》Switch 发售覆盖的是一款以 14.99 美元上市的轨道射击游戏。这三篇讲的都是任天堂硬件上的发售，而不是评测分数。
Sources & reporting limits来源与核查范围
Follow Console games to find related stories on your next visit.关注主机游戏，下次访问时阅读相关文章。
