Explainer / Published 2026-10-26

We Were Here Tomorrow makes time and communication part of the puzzle

The October 20 co-op adventure gives two players different information, a walkie-talkie, and tools for changing how past and future spaces connect.

Two puzzle-room states are joined by a glowing timeline and hourglass: a green room with a radio in the foreground, and a darker room with a suspended platform.
Conceptual editorial illustration; not a documentary photograph.

THE SHORT VERSION

  • We Were Here Tomorrow launched October 20 on Steam, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X|S as a two-player asymmetric co-op puzzle adventure.
  • Players use walkie-talkies and unique tools to compare different information; some actions in the past affect the partner’s future.
  • PC Gamer reports cross-play between Steam, PS5, and Xbox Series X|S, while the developer’s page describes the two-player communication structure.

The release is built around two players

We Were Here Tomorrow launched on October 20, 2026, as the sixth game in Total Mayhem Games’ co-op puzzle series. The developer’s page calls it an asymmetric co-op adventure and says each player carries a walkie-talkie and a unique tool. That description gives the basic rule before a team starts: the two players are meant to compare what they see and coordinate their actions, rather than simply move through the same room together.

The story begins with a rescue expedition in Antarctica. The partners wake inside Norček Industries, a retro-futuristic research facility run by Director Kathleen Bowe. The Xbox Wire preview, written by the game’s creative director, says the facility is studying an interdimensional rift and that the players encounter spaces with different rules. The setup is science fiction, but the game’s immediate problem is practical: each person must explain enough of their surroundings for the other to make a useful move.

The partners do not see the same version of every room

The Greenhouse is one of the first places shown by the developer. It includes references to earlier games in the series, but the main difference is temporal: the two players occupy different points in time. An action in the past changes conditions for the person in the future. The walkie-talkie lets each player describe a separate view and compare what changed, so a clue can depend on a detail neither person can use alone.

That design puts observation and communication inside the puzzle. A player who sees a switch, plant, or path needs to report the relevant detail clearly enough for the partner to identify the matching object in a different state. The developer’s article says the time-swap mechanic asks players to consider cause and effect outside their own immediate surroundings. It does not publish puzzle solutions, so teams should expect to discover each room’s rules rather than follow a known walkthrough.

Some puzzles bring both players into the same space

Not every section separates the partners. In the Office of Tomorrow, the developer describes spaces where gravity and architecture behave in unusual ways. Players move through a shared environment and use tools while testing how the room works. That changes the conversation from “what do you see?” to “what can we try together?” The article says these rooms are meant to add traversal and experimentation alongside the separated-view puzzles.

The Optics Lab returns to the more familiar pattern: both players can see each other, but they are not physically in the same space. Each person has different information and must communicate to set up a sequence of laser refractions. The creative director describes it as one of the more difficult puzzles in the first act. A team should expect to describe positions and actions carefully; being able to see a partner’s avatar does not reveal the other player’s clues.

Tools support the time puzzle instead of replacing talk

The game adds abilities that players can upgrade. PC Gamer’s preview names a block that can hold down buttons and a deployable platform for reaching high spaces. Those objects help with traversal or timing, but they do not remove the need to explain the puzzle. If one player has a tool that changes the room and the other sees the result in a later time, both have to agree on what changed and which action caused it.

The developer also describes later areas that extend beyond the research facility and cross the rift into a different environment. It withholds those story details in its preview, so the public description does not establish how long the final sequence lasts or how many puzzles use the time mechanic. The verified design point is the recurring one: separate views, tools, and cause-and-effect changes form the communication loop.

The launch platforms can play together

The game launched for Steam, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X|S. PC Gamer reports cross-play across those three platforms, which means partners do not need to own the same system according to that outlet’s September 20 pre-release report. The developer page links directly to the Steam, PlayStation, and Xbox editions. Check the local store for the current price and any account or online requirements before inviting a partner.

The developer’s product page describes a two-person pairing and walkie-talkies, but does not spell out every matchmaking, voice-chat, or local co-op option. PC Gamer’s page confirms cross-play but does not provide platform-specific voice requirements. A team should make sure both players can communicate clearly through the supported in-game or external voice option they choose; the exact setup depends on the devices they use.

Norček Industries gives the puzzles a story frame

The facility is more than a series of rooms. The developer’s preview describes Director Bowe as a scientist and manager who is trying to explain the research program, while the players uncover clues about the rift and the missing expedition. The story’s central question is what lies beyond the rift and why Norček is studying it. The preview leaves the answer undisclosed, so a launch guide should not spoil or invent it.

The setting moves between rescue-mission tension and strange research-facility puzzles. In the Greenhouse, the two timelines can make familiar locations feel different; in the Optics Lab, the partners are visible to one another but still lack the same information. Those examples show how the game ties its story premise to specific puzzle rules. The review preview by PC Gamer also identifies Claire North as the story writer, a useful detail for players deciding whether the narrative is part of the appeal.

Pick a partner who wants to talk through clues

The best fit is a pair who are comfortable describing what is on screen and testing an idea together. The game’s official page says the walkie-talkie and unique tools are part of each player’s kit; the developer preview says the partners need to compare different perspectives and reason about actions across time. A quiet player can still take part, but the game gives communication a central job rather than treating it as an optional social feature.

If your regular partner is on another platform, PC Gamer’s cross-play note is useful. If you are deciding whether both players should buy the game, check the product listings and platform terms for each account. The sources do not confirm a one-copy guest pass or a specific local split-screen option. The reliable expectation is two-player co-op across the listed platforms, with a puzzle design that rewards clear descriptions more than fast reflexes.

Sources & reporting limits

  1. We Were Here Tomorrow
  2. Discover the Secrets Waiting Inside Norček Industries in We Were Here Tomorrow
  3. Co-op puzzle game We Were Here Tomorrow is out next month, so you've got time to practise your communication skills
Keep the thread.

Follow PC games to find related stories on your next visit.

THE WEEKLY EDIT

The week, made clear.

Stories worth understanding, brought together in one weekly edition.

Share this page

Instagram, TikTok & other apps

Copy the page link, then paste it where your chosen app supports links. You choose whether to send or publish.